Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(10): 2744-2751, 2020 12 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1066273

ABSTRACT

The clinical signs and symptoms of acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are not pathogen specific. Highly sensitive and specific nucleic acid amplification tests have become the diagnostic reference standard for viruses, and translation of bacterial assays from basic research to routine clinical practice represents an exciting advance in respiratory medicine. Most recently, molecular diagnostics have played an essential role in the global health response to the novel coronavirus pandemic. How best to use newer molecular tests for RTI in combination with clinical judgment and traditional methods can be bewildering given the plethora of available assays and rapidly evolving technologies. Here, we summarize the current state of the art with respect to the diagnosis of viral and bacterial RTIs, provide a practical framework for diagnostic decision making using selected patient-centered vignettes, and make recommendations for future studies to advance the field.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Tract Infections , Viruses , Humans , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Viruses/genetics
2.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 33(4): 304-311, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-643197

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) are essential for the clinical care of immunocompromised individuals. These patients often require specialized testing not available from commercial manufacturers and are therefore dependent on the laboratory to create, validate, and perform these assays. Recent paradigm-shifting legislation could alter the way that LDTs are operationalized and regulated. RECENT FINDINGS: On March 5th, 2020 the Verifying Accurate and Leading-Edge In-Vitro Clinical Tests Development Act (VALID) was introduced in the US Congress. This statute would overhaul existing regulatory framework by unifying the oversight of LDTs and commercial in-vitro diagnostic tests (IVDs) through the FDA. If enacted, LDTs would be subject to regulatory requirements like those found in commercial submissions for market review. Stakeholders continue to discuss the details and scope of the proposed legislation in the setting of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 pandemic, where LDTs are integral to the national COVID-19 response. SUMMARY: Congressional lawmakers have introduced legislation to alter the regulatory framework governing LDTs. Moving forward, a balance must be struck to ensure the availability of safe and accurate testing without delays or overregulation that could be harmful to patients. The downstream implications of how VALID and other legislation will impact laboratories, clinicians, and patients warrant close examination.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Immunocompromised Host , Laboratories, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Uncertainty , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Congresses as Topic , Health Services Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Pandemics , Quality Assurance, Health Care , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL